Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Crist's avatar

Thanks for the restack! Hope this is helpful :)

Mr. Genius Refferator's avatar

Really interesting workflow, but I think the privacy section is far too relaxed. Giving a cloud‑based LLM full access to your filesystem means you’re effectively exporting your entire knowledge base — meeting notes, strategy docs, internal processes — to an external entity you don’t control.

Even if the provider promises not to train on your data and to delete it within 30 days, there’s no way to independently verify what happens inside their infrastructure, backups, logs, or telemetry systems. For individuals this might be fine, but for anyone handling proprietary know‑how or sensitive business information, the risk profile is significantly higher.

It also creates the perfect environment for rent‑seeking behavior, where large companies can absorb or replicate smaller firms’ ideas and then lock them behind licensing models. That dynamic is already common in the industry, and giving cloud providers direct access to your internal workflows only amplifies it.

The same system built on a local, self‑hosted model would offer all the benefits without exposing your intellectual property to the cloud. For serious work, that’s a much safer long‑term direction.

80 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?